Pro/Forums - View Single Post - Why does one outlet provide less restriction?

SysCrusher · 05-16-2004, 09:24 AM

This is JoeC's test.

Code:

                            c/w   psi   inch/h20
Danger Den RBX #1 Plate     0.13  0.59  16.3 
Danger Den TDX #4 Plate     0.14  0.51  14.1

The only thing I seen in pHaestus' test was the GPM comparison where the TDX was a higher GPM. How the channels sit over the die wouldn't make a difference if any unless the cpu die it self is longer than the total width of the channels. That I don't know since I never measured the channel width versus the cpu die.

05-16-2004, 09:24 AM	#7
SysCrusher Cooling Savant Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Florida Posts: 256	This is JoeC's test. Code: c/w psi inch/h20 Danger Den RBX #1 Plate 0.13 0.59 16.3 Danger Den TDX #4 Plate 0.14 0.51 14.1 The only thing I seen in pHaestus' test was the GPM comparison where the TDX was a higher GPM. How the channels sit over the die wouldn't make a difference if any unless the cpu die it self is longer than the total width of the channels. That I don't know since I never measured the channel width versus the cpu die. Last edited by SysCrusher; 05-16-2004 at 09:42 AM.