Quote:
|
Originally Posted by unregistered
no, Les does know more
but Les did not make the assertion, so not his problem to defend or disprove
nor jd, do I believe you understand the question; can you state it ?
|
He doesn't? What about all the testing he goes on about then?
The question is easy, no?
Quote:
Originally Posted by JFettig
The only problem it seems you have is you need much thicker material for the cold plate, I'm talking 10-13mm thick.
Jon
|
Implies the cold plate needs to be thicker than the 3mm material kizzap has will not be sufficient for the cold plate.
Then Les said:
Quote:
It looks like a definitive statement.
Evidence?
Theory or definitive Bull Shit?
|
Implies Jfettig has no evidence to support that the 3mm material is not sufficient for a cold plate and/or the 10-13mm thick material Jfettig threw out has no evidence to be proven correct.
Les, thanks for the answer and I was correct IMO. You do know more than most of us put together on the subject. Your statment is proof as I bet 98% of all members on this forum had no idea that "The theory is that the optimum Cu thickness is dependent on Peltier area and Film Coefficient(h) -" was even in the equation. I have been doing this for over 3 years now and had no idea myself.