View Single Post
Unread 05-20-2004, 01:54 PM   #8
Wildfrogman
Cooling Neophyte
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 31
Default

wildfrogman Quote:
though with the small barb~hose connection size its geared towards the lower flow group.


Quote:
Originally Posted by pHaestus
Not so. The MCW500x was far more geared to the low pressure pump crowd. This block looks to me like it was redesigned to take better advantage of the higher pressure offered from Swiftech's MCP600 pump. Having said that, it looks like the MCW6000 will perform better than the MCW5000 across the board:

http://www.swiftnets.com/products/mcw6000.asp
Thanks for catching me on that, I was thinking higher flow rate restriction from smaller barbs, smaller hose, pin fin=lower flow rate. Not lower pressure exactly but just would perform very good even at low flowrates.

Interesting about Joe's differing test results for the headloss.. , thanks for the heads up.
Wildfrogman is offline   Reply With Quote