Quote:
|
Originally Posted by AngryAlpaca
I concur. Correcting his comments at the end of his article is becoming a daily event...
unregistered: I was thinking you meant that, but some of your results have begun to surprise me. It started here: The pressure drop does seem to actually be LOWER than the 5000, according to Joe's setup, and common sense. Also, there's that 34" drop on Joe's testbed, compared to your 20". Maybe Joe's testbed has gone wacky... I feel somewhat obligated, as a consumer, to not trust the results of the corporation that made the product.
|
in that quote he is probably referring to the first version of the mcw5000, where the top alu piece has the extra space for water to flow, contrary to the mcw5000 v2 and mcw5002 (which differ only by the fittings, kinda like the 6000 and 6002), which eliminate that "space", high flow velocity etc.
i think joeC's comparison (and the one you see in your head) is between the second mcw5000 and the mcw5002