jmke there is a large difference in stating "your review was crappy because your conclusions are not borne out by your testing methods" and saying "your reviews are technically very good but are biased towards a particular company". The ONLY way for l3d's comments to be true are for me to be making up test results. I do not think this is a minor issue; he is directly attacking my credibility without a shred of proof. I am happy to produce all the raw data from waterblock testing, but would expect there to be some consequences for l3d when his comments are proven to be libelous.
|