View Single Post
Unread 06-07-2004, 03:21 PM   #17
redleader
Thermophile
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: The deserts of Tucson, Az
Posts: 1,264
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trekari
What I meant by that is a 4 pass design would spend more time inside the radiator than a two pass design at the same flow rate.

I know flow rate is important, I did not intend to imply that slower flow rates equal better performance. I may not know scientific data about watercooling, but I'm not /that/ naive.

-Jas
But adding more passes does not cause the water to stay in the radiator longer. Think about it and you'll see why.

Quote:
What do you mean by turbulators?
Something to mix up the water as it passes through. Improves performance somewhat.


Quote:
What kinds of cooling performance difference would I see in delivering the hot CPU water to the NB, and subsequently the GPU?
Hot is a relative term here. You're looking at about one degree difference between the hottest and coolest parts of your loop with 1/2 tube and dual pumps most likely. Water holds a LOT of energy without getting much warmer.
redleader is offline   Reply With Quote