View Single Post
Unread 06-10-2004, 01:43 PM   #13
Cathar
Thermophile
 
Cathar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 2,538
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Les
Do you mean incorrectly calibrated?
No, not meaning that at all. Have been most impressed with Phaestus's calibration work.

Meaning that the readings are peculiar to the CPU (and its diode) itself, and to a lesser extent the effect of the motherboard.

The 11.33x7.37mm (83.5mm^2) T'Bred B die, with the calculated ~75W heat load producing ~9-10C delta's resulting in calculated C/W's of around 0.12-0.13 seems to me to be a bit low, and has nothing at all to do with Phaestus's exemplary calibration work. Would personally feel more comfortable with derived C/W's of around the 0.20 mark given those dimensions. Even accounting for secondary heat paths, I am still grappling with accepting that the motherboard's secondary heat paths could be half as effective again as the waterblock is at removing heat from the CPU.

Last edited by Cathar; 06-10-2004 at 01:48 PM.
Cathar is offline   Reply With Quote