The whole issues of precision, accuracy, and repeatablitily is one thats been plaguing this group since the beginning. Its seems nearly impossible to get decent numbers that truly stack up against someone else's.
I will say that I find decent repeatability depending on what changing I'm measuring. But, since I don't have a "true" number to compare my measurements against, all I'm really saying is that most of my measurements are "in the zone" of my expectations. So, yeah, not exactly scientific.
It there a decent solution? Is it possible to build a GOOD socket adapter with accurate thermal monitoring that is a cut or 10 above the crap on the diode? How effective is water temp monitoring given the turbulence and variations in flow still just give a ballpark on the actual temps?
*sigh* Glad I'm a programmer. I'd spend waaayyy to long trying to find some decent solution.
__________________
Thou art God.
|