Quote:
|
Originally Posted by unregistered
modenaf1
just lost a lengthy response and am bummed, will take another pass tomorrow
I am the VP of Engn at Swiftech so you may be assured that I have some comments about grossly inaccurate product descriptions.
And, consistant with my responsibilities, I do act to reduce the number of such mis-leading 'reviews'. I believe you understood me correctly.
|
Ok, thank you for clarifying. As I stated before this was an article, not a review. Over at geeksonline we have not officially "reviewed" any waterblocks yet. An official "review" in my opinion at least, would consist of listing the system used, the watercooling setup, the thermal compound, ambient temperature, and actually getting a block to put on the system and listing the CPU diode temp, then testing sevral other blocks in comparison under the same conditions and listing their diode temp.
There could be more to that, again, I am not into watercooling.
I can understand where you are coming from here, but if sevral people on random forums, lets call it person A on forum X and person b on forum y. If both person A and B said something you did not like about your blocks perhaps inacurate, but maybe accurate under their testing situation, would you refuse to send a block to review to the front page of forum X and forum Y? Just think about it.
Quote:
|
just lost a lengthy response and am bummed, will take another pass tomorrow
|
Don't bother, you clarified perfectly what I need to know. Thank you.
BTW, anything over 10 lines or so I usually Ctrl-C it. After losing many (unfortunatly
) lengthy responses to things I made it a habbit.