[AngryAlpaca]

Time for the great long bash.

(if they argue with this then that’s unfortunate check wcing101 if you really want proof that watercooling is superior to aircooling).

This guy doesn't seem to understand that "watercooling" isn't a single product, as this statement just proved. There are thousands of products out there and some are better and some are worse.

(check ocforums on the listing on peoples overclocks most water beat air on the same system)

See above.

(xoxide sells wcing kits for less then 175 if you don’t think they exist but if I had 175 I could still make a MUCH better wcing kit out of maze 4 or TC-4 so this is only an example)

Yeah a shit system, probably. Got proof of the TC-4 performance?

(to my knowledge all waterblocks that are modern and especially modern retail ones have “barbs” in which the water comes in and out as well even though ive seen some crazy custom alternatives however you can visit dangerden or dtek and look at the barbs).

"quick connects"

The inside is usually designed to allow high water flow (when the water stops it will probably heat up and the cpu will fry eventually unless you have some convection action like a heatpipe also higher flow crashing into the walls of the waterblock means more turbulence and higher flow means u can add more blocks to the chain) and a lot of water turbulence (when water crashes on the sides of the inside of the waterblock and bounces off abck into the water and goes everywhere everytime it hits the wall it has slightly more pressure then if it just flowed by therefore more water atoms touch the walls of the waterblock which means more heat is transferred from the conductive amterial to the water) to allow for maximum cooling (more cooling is better I think).

Turbulence is frequently the opposite of higher flow. Turbulence reduces flow while flow increases turbulence. Is it true that turbulence increases pressure?

While it is true there is a threshold in which water flow is to fast and hurts the performance this is usually not achieved and why do you think systems with a pump like hydor L30 beat systems that are identical in every way except they use hydor L20)

And where is this point of too much flow? Hmm... Is it, maybe, never?

(when you get a pump with higher gph overall the whole cycle will speed up and the water will flow through faster and I consider these pumps OVERALL to be better with some exceptions).

With a higher overall flow of course the water will flow faster... Nice one, dumbass.

Even though silver is a better choice of material silver tends to cost slightly more).

Slightly more? Who here is a multibillionaire?

No matter how much you sand a cpu surface or waterblock theres always microscopic cracks even on polarFlo’s SF waterblock which has an optical finish.)

It seems that most blocks are visible in the light spectrum, unfortunately.

good bases are shiny (shiny means less microscopic cracks and smaller cracks which means less areas which the heat can’t come out of even though thermal paste fills most of these cracks))

Finish versus flatness... Shiny means just that, that it's shiny.

(ive seen these roles reversed however they do not get as good temperatures)

Proof?

(because the water splits this hurts the water flow quite a lot as seen in RBX’s restriction. It gets worst with a nozzle like nozzle 5 however if you have a good pump then use nozzle 5 by all means because you will get better performance usually).

Less restriction (doubling the surface area through which to flow) equals a more restrictive block?

(well I suppose theres some insane alternative that I haven’t figured out yet however the majority of the watercooling systems use a pump such as eheim 1250).

Have you heard of natural convection? It's what most things are cooled by.

(gph,size,barb size, noise, how its powered, I consider that there are many, even more the the ones I listed).

He missed the most important one! How could you miss pressure?!

(this is America I use gallons and I explain the effect of having head in a few sentancese later but I consider flow rate>head).

I love blowjobs. I dunno... Cool computer or a blowjob... Hmm...

(if you go higher then this usually the water flows to quickly to absorb a good amount of heat and the pump will usually add heat to the water if its this powerful).

It flows too quickly to pick up heat? I'd imagine that Tornados move the air too quickly to cool processors...

Also, a side importance is the Head amount, or how far the water can spray going straight up (in watercooling terms that is what head means. Howfar the water can go straight up before if stops. I measure this in feet).

Not quite. It's how much back pressure (feet of water is the norm for measuring pump head) the pump can push against, or how high the column of water in a tube straight above the outlet can be before the pump stops moving water.

(this pump would throw out a lot of water but it could only go up 2 feet before it stops so that’s usually not good especially in a tall full tower)

It would throw out very little water because it couldn't overcome the back pressure of the system. In a closed loop (most that we use are closed) the vertical height matters little.

Some really strong pumps actually add heat to the water which is very bad (like eheim 1260).

Name a SINGLE pump that doesn't and I'll give you a cookie and stop insulting your stupidity.

This usually (keyword) occurs in pumps that are over 500 GPH (pumps lower then 500 gph like eheim 1250 don’t add heat to the water flow however the keyword here is usually).

WTF?!

(one of my friends who knows a lot more about watercooling than me {edited for stupidit})

Anyone? Please, be more specific.

and allows the water to sit idle and cool off a bit before re-entering the cycle[b] (it doesn’t do a very good job however).

That's not the purpose at all.

(the flow slows down when it enters the large body of water until it gets to the other barb where it accelerates a little however it loses some kenetic energy for potential energy therefore it wont flow quite as fast)

Normally, we measure water movement in flow, not speed. Each to his own (stupid, in your case) measurements.

[(yields better temperatures according to wcing101

Proof please.[/quote]This also bleeds much better (see comparisons on forums) and does not hinder your flow (same size all the way through means the water doesn’t lose its speed).[/quote] Proof and see above.

however you might want to add more substances to ensure maximum performance (antifreeze or waterwetter or zerex all stop the fun green living stuff from growing in ur computer).

It doesn't quite add performance as much as remove it.

(research on ocforums what happens when u change the orders…quite a big temperature difference

Proof. That doesn't agree with any testing I've seen.

Pump>Radiator>CPU block>GPU or northbridge block (both optional)>any other watercooling blocks you have such as HDD or ram>reservoir or t-line (t-line should be at highest point of the system if possible)>pump. (this is arguable however if you want I can type approx 1 page paper on why I think this is the best order)

I'd bet that this page wouldn't have one useful and/or accurate sentence in it... I'd like it see it anyway.

(keep in mind that this is forum nubbins so if u wanna get into the advanced arguments then by all means I can whip out t3h physics of watercooling)

If you want to learn anything about watercooling, "nubbins," consider forums.procooling.com as you might learn something that is accurate or at least close.

It's amazing that he's so bad at satire that he makes mistakes while doing it. Can someone post this on that forum for me?