I think we understand most of that.
The main point is that you are a very popular mag and most of your readers are not able to see the problems in testing that we can see. If your testing is not totaly up to scratch you may be misleading a large amount of people and that does not sit well with us.
Its a fact, your testing is suspect. Mainly because you dont detail how you test very well. (i dont recall seeing any thing about control of ambiant tempreture which will have a direct effect on results). Partly because we see some errors in your explinations methods and results.
What i suggest is that you tell us exactly how you go about testing and then we may be able to help you in the right direction.
Dont take my comments too seriously most of the time im just having a joke. It is true that your results tend to contradict pervious testing results but if you can proove your testing is good il change my oppinions
slater..