View Single Post
Unread 08-19-2004, 01:05 PM   #15
Les
Cooling Savant
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Wigan UK
Posts: 929
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pHaestus
Les:
Old numbers had some issues re: probes being moved around and offsets not carefully kept up with/written down.
Remember the problems.In fact the value of the offset was the crux.

Quote:
Originally Posted by pHaestus
Now EVERY wb produces the same dT(Water in - water out) for a given flow rate, and if W is calculated from those dTs and flow rates then it stays very close to constant. The dT(CPU-water in) numbers are all ok (see the Pro/Testing graph or I'd be happy to send you a txt file), but the dT Water and the resulting W are not at all correct. My preference is 71W for power in all the wb tests based upon current (better?) testing.
......

Happy with your dT(cpu - water in)

Would like to see some dT(water out - water in) data
Maybe a revival of the thread
I still believe that W should vary with both flow-rate and wb type.

Last edited by Les; 08-19-2004 at 01:18 PM.
Les is offline   Reply With Quote