Let's break out the evidence:
Fact one is supported by Bill's radiator testing here:
http://thermal-management-testing.com/ThermoChill.htm
Fact two is covered by this:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mr. Thompson
Take a look at the chart below by Bill Adams. You will note for a typical setup, the water temperature after the waterblock does not go up more than 0.5C. Serial plumbing makes sense.
load W . . flow . . . die T . . bp T . . inlet T . outlet T . C/W . . Btus*. . Watts . %eff
45.00 . .2.0/7.57 . . 36.5 . . 27.1 . . 25.00 . . 25.08 . . 0.256 . . 144 . . . 42.2 . . 94
45.01 . .1.5/5.68 . . 36.7 . . 27.3 . . 25.00 . . 25.11 . . 0.260 . . 148 . . . 43.4 . . 96
45.01 . .1.0/3.79 . . 37.2 . . 27.7 . . 25.00 . . 25.17 . . 0.271 . . 153 . . . 44.8 . . 99
45.01 . .0.5/1.89 . . 38.2 . . 28.7 . . 25.00 . . 25.33 . . 0.293 . . 148 . . . 43.4 . . 94
75.02 . .2.0/7.57 . . 45.0 . . 29.4 . . 25.00 . . 25.14 . . 0.267 . . 234 . . . 68.6 . . 91
75.02 . .1.5/5.68 . . 45.4 . . 29.8 . . 25.00 . . 25.18 . . 0.272 . . 243 . . . 71.2 . . 95
75.02 . .1.0/3.79 . . 46.1 . . 30.4 . . 25.00 . . 25.28 . . 0.281 . . 251 . . . 73.6 . . 98
75.02 . .0.5/1.89 . . 47.8 . . 32.0 . . 25.00 . . 25.56 . . 0.304 . . 251 . . . 73.6 . . 98
105.04 .2.0/7.57 . . 53.3 . . 31.6 . . 25.00 . . 25.19 . . 0.269 . . 341 . . . 99.9 . . 95
105.04 .1.5/5.68 . . 53.9 . . 32.1 . . 25.00 . . 25.26 . . 0.275 . . 350 . . . 102.6 . . 98
105.04 .1.0/3.79 . . xxxx . . 33.0 . . 25.00 . . 25.39 . . xxxxx . . 350 . . . 102.6 . . 98
105.04 .0.5/1.89 . . 56.9 . . 35.2 . . 25.00 . . 25.77 . . 0.304 . . 346 . . . 101.4 . . 97
|
Flow rate one:
http://www.procooling.com/articles/h...haestus__1.php
Teeline can be from all the pictures in this thread of water not leaving the system.
I can't do the aluminum one as it is just so stupid (the myth part)
Gold's been covered.
Do we really need to prove that mercury is poisonous?
http://pasture.ecn.purdue.edu/~mercury/src/poison.htm
AF:
http://www.overclockers.com/articles609/index.asp
Bleach has been covered
I don't know of where to get data on sensors other than Cathar's comments. Maybe you could do a quick check, pHaestus?
Digidoc info is provided by the company.
Condensation... Can't occur as you need something below ambient being introduced, and from ANY radiator testing it is shown that temperatures below ambient can not be reached.
Flatness is just from Bill's comments,
http://www.swiftnets.com/
Eye testers: look at the WW. It's a bunch of fins that run parallel to the water. It should cool about as well as a Slitedge from looking at it. All the clones show this too.
I'm not quite sure how you put this in or whatever you do.