Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Les
Main prob with beermat sums is the beer usually takes precedence over the sums.
Have added the 100kw/m^2*c case to graph
|
Looks familiar.
Some internals:
A better image of the Base.
A remount and cleanup gave a small improvement to the numbers.
It is averaging 0.166 C/W, about 0.023 C/W better than the Crater.
I think this might exceed the Cascade. Hard to say though because the Crater was so restrictive, for a given pumping pressure it may be worse.
Need Pressure drop.
Les, a thought about the C/W vs BP thickness. I'm basing my numbers on a changing water/copper interface area using a 45 degree assumption. Waterloo is maintaining a constant interface area is it not?