"champions of liberty ? "
In my opinion there are none.
"They were not tortured but humiliated"
??
humiliated?Come on!
It's not so much invading a sovereign state, breaking all the rules of international law, forcing all to believe a mistification served as a "motive" for action.
Sure Saddam, was out of line, but a menace?What about Iran or China or North Korea or the african countries born from independence movements in the Sixties and Seventies, generally supported by the so-called bastioms of freedom, that now are the the wasteland of this world, mere trading posts for smuggling arms and the likes?
This world is the direct consequence of the wrong politics of a "cold war".
"Sure, it is going to take a while to get things sorted out in Iraq, but look at the formation of any country - establishing a strong democratic system isn't an immediate process."
Is the American people aware that such process can take from 10 to 20 years?
Are you ready to stay there all this time?
BalefireX, the images shown daily don't have any smell, or taste, they're just it - plain images and they just show what you see from the camera lens, nothing more nothing less.
If you want, try to see them with your sound off.
The thing is the "old powers" abdicated their military power and influence after WWII in favour of America, but at the same time they consider themselves the mannors of the house, like the old nobles. So, everything must be done in their fashion.
Only nowadays, the military power is the facto power.
America invaded Iraq, only because it could do so.
Bin Laden issue was something uncertain (as it proved to be), no one knew when or where, something had to be done.
|