Quote:
Originally Posted by AngryAlpaca
Zinc is higher on the electrochemical series. It'd own aluminum ever so slowly.
|
Own? Aluminum
eats zinc, but yes slowly.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jman1310
ah, well aluminum isn't normally used on the running gear of a boat so I didn't know that!
but what of the question in general, is a sacrificial metal a good idea?
|
I actually have a workhorse powerboat made entirely of unpainted aluminum. On second thought, I think the steering cable to the outboard is steel... *shudders*. I've never seen aluminum used deliberately in craft without aluminum hulls.
Is a sacrificial metal a good idea? Nothing that would react quickly, I think. We don't want haze and particles. I wouldn't add a third metal like zinc to give copper better fodder than aluminum, because copper will just chew into that zinc and make a mess. With steel bridges and cranes we don't mind a bar of zinc crumbling in the elements, but inside a closed cooling loop we do.
I
would consider a sacrificial metal if very slow to corrode - and in practice this means it wouldn't be a
third metal but a
second. This seems pointless until we consider that the cathode metal of a galvanic couple corrodes less slowly than just by itself. An all copper & brass loop might benefit from, say, tin. The tin would act as a weak corrosion inhibitor.