Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bellevegasj
Bush is a draft dodger. Technically, he's a deserter for not being AWOL for over 30 days.  He used his daddys political influence to get into the National Guard then didn't even stay the whole time.
Clinton didn't get a lot of grief for being a draft dodger, but he did about lying about a blowjob. Wtf does a bj have to do with U.S policy??? Bush should be brought up on crimes against humanity. He lied about WMD's, he lies about wanting to free Iraq and sheep like you believe his every word.
Clinton didn't deny ducking the draft. He sent people into war not to flex American muscle, to grow the Empire, for oil, to finish what his daddy didn't, he didn't lie about why or what he was doing.... and that's the difference.
And maybe the soldiers in Vietnam that were mowing down whole villages of unarmed civilians(not that this was the nor, but it did happen) as well as the president should have been charged with being war criminals? Maybe???
Look, I know that you wont admit that I'm right. I doubt that you will admit it in your own head that I'm right, I doubt that you can. I saw a poll recently that 80% of the people that watch Fox news still believe that Iraq had WMD's. You're like some chick that stays at home every night while her husband is out with the 'boys' all night then comes home smelling like perfume and sometimes a few glitter flakes. You're in denial. No biggie. Clearly 48% of you monkeys are - according to the latest poll. |
OK first you don't know the first thing about the UCMJ. Your application of article 86 is completely wrong. As are the pundits for Kerry. Article 86 does not apply to drilling reservist. Try again.
Invade for oil...take economics 101 kid. It’s cheaper to just give them green paper for it.
I could care less about Clintons Blow Job in the Oval Office...I kind had always assumed it was a tradition anyway. The fact that he lied at all is what got conservatives up in arms. Personally, I could care less.
The point about Clinton was that the left wing said nothing about the troop commitments for the war in Kosovo. Why don't you please explain to the rest of use why it was necessary to take out Milosevic...Don't worry I agree with Clintons thinking but I'd like to see you contrast that with our current situation.
War crimes happen and the perpetrators are punished. It has happened in all wars, don't assume that means it is accepted or condoned. Heads of state would only be responsible for war crimes if they ordered it or condoned it, as in the case of Milosevic or Saddam.
I was one of the guys going across the berm into Iraq...I am almost certain that they did NOT have WMD.
I think that the following quote is more to your mentality.
"My good friends, for the second time in our history, a British Prime Minister has returned from Germany bringing peace with honor. I believe it is peace for our time... Go home and get a nice quiet sleep."
-Neville Chamberlain-
after signing the Munich Pact with Hitler