Quote:
|
Originally Posted by miladiou
isn't the CIA who claimed saddam had weapon of mass destruction???
|
That stuff about the oil-for-food corruption comes from of the Iraq Survey Group, not the CIA at large. The Iraq Survey Group's mandate, since it finally had to conclude Iraq secreted no weapons prohibited it at the time of invasion, has expanded to validate the necessity of invasion by any means. Americans really need reassurance, the ISG's job has always been to provide it.
Recent events show the ISG has absolutely no interest in surveying or overseeing weapons stored post-invasion at former military bases. I wonder if anybody there does, besides a few Iraqis of course.
The CIA, without naming organs, is a fine organisation in my opinion.
Here's the summary of ISG's work, before mission creep took over:
Duelfer Disproves U.S. WMD Claims
@jaydee116. Weird link. If I were a ballistic missile, this is how I'd see the world.
Why don't you just read
your own government's latest (Oct. 6th 2004) report on the status of WMD during Iraq's Ba'ath regime, and end this fantasy. You were fooled. Now they don't need to fool you anymore about that, because you're determined to stay the course, and so on.
I'll leave this thread too, it devolves, but I'll drop the key to understanding the WMD puzzle:
Google "Hussein Kamel"