View Single Post
Unread 12-17-2004, 01:46 AM   #63
Incoherent
Cooling Savant
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Vallentuna, Sweden
Posts: 410
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Althornin
Please say "bullshit" to everyone else who used the incorrect terminology before me in this thread.
LOL


Sorry, I was a bit grumpy yesterday morning. That comes off as a bit rude I guess, not my intention or normal nature.
It is kind of hard to refute a lot of this thread, much of it takes the form of questions and there's no such thing as an incorrect question. On the other hand it is very easy to make an incorrect answer, especially when it is on the boundary of one own knowledge. So I'll just hang out and watch, emitting the odd "bullshit!" when I see something wrong which is within my perimeter .

Albigger, I like your explanation of the boundary layer aspect, a minimum required thickness being very small. Since the waterblock geometry can be optimised to actually reduce this layer, over a larger area, it starts becoming clear (to me at least) that direct die can never be as effective within the working bounds of "normal" pumps. Direct dies' saving grace is perhaps the lack of TIM joint.
Incoherent is offline   Reply With Quote