Quote:
|
Originally Posted by BalefireX
The guy reported what he saw. If that doesn't agree with the theory then we can try and figure out why that is, but unless you are going to take the step of suggesting he falsified numbers, there is no reason to abuse him over it. I'm all for scientific testing, but how does it help in any way when we push away anyone who shows an interest in the subject? We should be helping these people improve, not telling them to "**** off"
|
It isn't theory dude. You been here long enough and seen the empirical evidence. Are you saying pH's testing is theory?
I think we all know this guys numbers are not falsified, they are just simply wrong. The evidence is out there to prove it is wrong yet he continues to say it isn't and gives no hint that he is remotely interested in learning why or improving his methods. So yeah, he can **** off and quiet frankly you can to if you want to defend such shit (speaking for myself not ProCooling remember).
Roscal I would be inclined to agree. However he did say he mounted the block several times in the review.
From his review I can conclude he has very little idea what he is doing and has no business writing reviews (personal opinion) for all to see.