View Single Post
Unread 12-18-2004, 12:55 PM   #21
WesM63
Cooling Neophyte
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: NW Ohio
Posts: 12
Default

I think we all know this guys numbers are not falsified, they are just simply wrong. The evidence is out there to prove it is wrong yet he continues to say it isn't and gives no hint that he is remotely interested in learning why or improving his methods. So yeah, he can **** off and quiet frankly you can to if you want to defend such shit (speaking for myself not ProCooling remember).

Hey WesM63.

It would be cool if you posted your testing methologies (number of block remounts, temp sensor used, ect).

That way, they can "trash" your review, properly, and it would become constructive critism as you can fix the major flaws in your reviewing process.


All of the methologies are in the review! Sad people really looked over them. (Multiple re-mounts is 3 in my case)

So I used MBM to monitor temps the margin of error is great there. Get over it, not everyone has access to a digital thermometer. Think about it, how many people out there build a water-cooled system expecting to put a very expensive Fluke digital thermometer on it just to monitor temps? Slim to none actually. Thats why I clearly stated the "Real World" part of it. It went into a Real system not something layed out on a bench or only part of a system.
WesM63 is offline   Reply With Quote