Quote:
|
Originally Posted by tayts1
heard this comment from another forums...any comment on it???
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Another thing is the design of the two blocks(MCW6002 & TDX). Sustained overclocks wise, I believe the DD TDX may very well do better than the MCW6002 due to the "impingement" design reflected in the usage of distributed nozzles, along with the distributed cooling effect of the nozzles. This has been shown as per the Cascade to have an effect on cooling & o/cing of cpus. The other way around it is to have a very thick copper base which the MCW6000 series has done away with and which the MCW5000 series actually had. The thick copper base aids in evening out the localised heatspots and heatspikes as experienced by CPU cores and does aide in o/cing too somewhat.....
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
first, the purported descrsption of the wb's baseplates is just incorrect
see where this is headed ?
who gives a flying f what that author "thinks", stuff it and him for being an ignorant ass
- for reference, which commercial wbs has this author designed ?
got any TEST RESUTLS to substantiate the patter ?
another internet expert