Pro/Forums - View Single Post

Orkan · 01-25-2005, 05:18 PM

http://www.procooling.com/html/pro_testing.php

Was the testing of the Dtek WhiteWater and TDX blocks on the above chart done on an Athlon64 with integrated heat spreader?

That is really my only concern. I know that the WW performs excellent while sitting directly on a die. The area that it is cooling is close to the same width as the channel. With the IHS found on A64's, that is not true.

Looking at it from that perspective, the TDX would seem a better choice as it has moving water over nearly the entire IHS.

If it matters, It will be in a loop with a Maze4 GPU cooler, a 2 bay bayres, and a Thermochill 120.3 rad.

Anyone have test results of a WW vs. a TDX on an A64 system?

01-25-2005, 05:18 PM	#5
Orkan Cooling Savant Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: inside my computers Posts: 113	http://www.procooling.com/html/pro_testing.php Was the testing of the Dtek WhiteWater and TDX blocks on the above chart done on an Athlon64 with integrated heat spreader? That is really my only concern. I know that the WW performs excellent while sitting directly on a die. The area that it is cooling is close to the same width as the channel. With the IHS found on A64's, that is not true. Looking at it from that perspective, the TDX would seem a better choice as it has moving water over nearly the entire IHS. If it matters, It will be in a loop with a Maze4 GPU cooler, a 2 bay bayres, and a Thermochill 120.3 rad. Anyone have test results of a WW vs. a TDX on an A64 system? __________________ www.dakotapc.com Performance Technology Solutions Last edited by Orkan; 01-25-2005 at 05:49 PM.