Quote:
|
Originally Posted by unregistered
to repeat a statement that many don't seem to want to hear:
the MCW6000 is better than the 6002
the MCW6002 was produced to afford those with 1/2" systems a means to more comfortably use the wb
any direct comparison I have made shows the 6000 always just a bit better, with a bit higher flow resistance due to the barbs
|
Have seen no Heat-die data ,by you, for the MCW6002.
Have only the Swiftech statement: "
Refined data is due for publication soon. Meanwhile, MCW6000 data curves may be used for indicative performance levels"
I feel justified in using the same "C/W" values, at the same flow, for the MCW6000 and MCW6002.