I think he mixed up his numbers. From the screen shot it looks like he put the overclocked chip frequency in with the non-overclocked CPU temps. At least thats the only reason I can think that the numbers he shows don't match the ones on the chart or the screen shots . . .
Regardless, those wattage calculators are random if used correctly, and he didn't put the correct wattage in for the CPU, so he'd have the wrong (already incorrect) figure anyway.
Maybe 3 consecutive mistakes make a right?