View Single Post
Unread 01-08-2002, 08:08 PM   #13
redleader
Thermophile
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: The deserts of Tucson, Az
Posts: 1,264
Default

Quote:
That way I would have the heat absorbsion of Copper and the quick cooling of Aluminum. That way I can have the best of both worls and still keep the price down.
Thats Bad Physics. Al does NOT release heat faster then Cu!

Again say it with me: in a closed system, specific heat capacity does not effect the overall thermal resistance of the system.

However Al is much easier machined, is lighter, and cheaper. So while Al is not a bad idea, it will not help with cooling performance compared to Cu assuming all other factors are equal.

And I personally would not buy a block that has both Al and Cu in direct contact with the water. If you go that route, I would have to see that at least some annodizing or some such precation was taken.
redleader is offline   Reply With Quote