View Single Post
Unread 03-31-2005, 05:26 PM   #12
Long Haired Git
Cooling Savant
 
Long Haired Git's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Sydney, Oz
Posts: 336
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JamesAvery22
Single pass has a lower pressure drop so more flow which equals better performance in most cases.
I'd love to see some well performed real-world testing showing this to be the case.

According to my calcs, the effect of a 120.2 dual pass HC on a WC loop that uses either of the high-impedence design water blocks (fins like LRWW or cups like Cascade) is negligable.
Eg: At 6.32 LPM I get a head of 0.116 mH20, versus 1.5mH20 for the block and 0.106 mH20 for the tubing.

Therefor, even if going to a zero resistance HC, the increase in flow is likely to be less than 1 LPM, and hence the impact to the block's performance is going to be less than 0.01 C/W.

Its going to be a different story on rigs that have high flow rates, but a 6 LPM or less its SFA.
__________________
Long Haired Git
"Securing an environment of Windows platforms from abuse - external or internal - is akin to trying to install sprinklers in a fireworks factory where smoking on the job is permitted." (Prof. Gene Spafford)
My Rig, in all its glory, can be seen best here
AMD XP1600 @ 1530 Mhz | Soyo Dragon + | 256 Mb PC2700 DDRAM | 2 x 40 Gb 7200rpm in Raid-0 | Maze 2, eheim 1250, dual heater cores! | Full specifications (PCDB)

Long Haired Git is offline   Reply With Quote