07-30-2005, 12:06 PM
|
#14
|
Cooling Neophyte
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: florida
Posts: 42
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cathar
imbabawu. Your post at OCAU, which is basically what was the content of your post here, was referred to the OCAU head moderator for independent assessment (completely outside of my control) on the basis that it crossed the line with respect to manufacturer independence. The issue with your post there, and here as well, is that it is a non-independent marketing comparison with the purpose to promote more sales for yourself, and doing so by using data that you have generated.
Everytime any manufacturer has done this, they have gotten roasted, and you are no exception.
Do not make this out like I am the one who is doing you wrong. I merely stated that you have crossed the line with respect to manufacturer etiquette on public forums. The last thing forum members want is manufacturers slagging each other off in public because they are all making claims that their product is better than a competing product, and that is exactly what you are doing. If you compared your block to a Danger Den TDX at OCAU, I would have referred your post to the senior moderator there as well.
I am not alone though in my opinion. Of the senior moderators at OCAU, 3 have already expressed their disapproval of your post, and have stated that it contravenes acceptable manufacturer etiquette. That's not me. That's 3 independent forum moderators. Final judgement by the head moderator is still being waited on.
This is not about me. Others here in this thread have all said the same thing that I said at OCAU. This is about your on-line behavior. Accept it.
|
You should be honored that he considers your design the ultimate comparison milestone
|
|
|