Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jaydee
As expected, didn't last very long.
|
Interesting. The last comment was about trolling - possible someone reported the thread as a troll and the admins closed it without really looking at it? Just trying to give them the benefit of the doubt.
Anyway, why not start parallel threads both there and
here - and be sure to put a link to the "other" thread in the very first post in each of the two parallel threads.
Then, of course, radiator testing figures to the side, there's the whole issue of whether OCAU actually
is biased in this way (which I don't have enough experience with OCAU to comment on) - IMHO it wouldn't be unreasonable to do the same thing (parallel threads) discussing this as well. If they don't close it, maybe there's no intentional bias...(?)
I've no problem with biased sources of information - so long as it's clear what their bias is.
[us-centric] IMHO that's what the "freedom of the press" was all about when the bill of rights were passed - not "neutral, unbiased" voices, but lots of competing, highly biased ones. Yes you have to be a critical thinker to figure out what might be "real" but that's the way the world is - you're never going to have neutral sources - just ones that claim to be (Like Fox networks - we all know how neutral
they are)[/us-centric]