Pro/Forums - View Single Post

ricecrispi · 09-08-2005, 05:28 PM

Thanks for clearing things up Cathar. I understand he uses different testbeds thats why I tried to list them. Looking back and forth it got confusing. I'm used to the old tbird sim and P4 testbed but all the other results from 2 different testbeds got the head spinning.

It just bothers me the APEX kit got such a seemingly lacking review.
The review was a page long and really lacking compared to old WCing reviews by JoeC.

Joe posted the large die sim results at .08C/W. He mentioned P4 test results but no post? I don't understand why he couldn't indulge when he covered the Kingwin aquastar 3x for 6 pages, expcially when it performs so bad.

He posted the old die sim results which are really bad, worse then TDX and many Wcing blocks. I'm guessing he used a different setup but with a small die sim the results was .15c/w, equal to mcw-5002?

09-08-2005, 05:28 PM	#111
ricecrispi Cooling Savant Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: california Posts: 429	Thanks for clearing things up Cathar. I understand he uses different testbeds thats why I tried to list them. Looking back and forth it got confusing. I'm used to the old tbird sim and P4 testbed but all the other results from 2 different testbeds got the head spinning. It just bothers me the APEX kit got such a seemingly lacking review. The review was a page long and really lacking compared to old WCing reviews by JoeC. Joe posted the large die sim results at .08C/W. He mentioned P4 test results but no post? I don't understand why he couldn't indulge when he covered the Kingwin aquastar 3x for 6 pages, expcially when it performs so bad. He posted the old die sim results which are really bad, worse then TDX and many Wcing blocks. I'm guessing he used a different setup but with a small die sim the results was .15c/w, equal to mcw-5002? Last edited by ricecrispi; 09-08-2005 at 05:43 PM.