View Single Post
Unread 09-12-2005, 10:06 AM   #135
bigben2k
Responsible for 2%
of all the posts here.
 
bigben2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Texas, U.S.A.
Posts: 8,302
Default

I took it for what it was worth, but what really spooked me is the numbers:

The best kit tested out with a C/W of "0.05". No error margins are stated, and with that kind of figure, it leaves a huge question about the results. If the error margin is +/- 0.01, then the order of the top 4 could be re-arranged any which way.
bigben2k is offline   Reply With Quote