Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Cathar
Could it be? :shrug:
That would explain a lot. The WW's cooling patch is ~17mm x 30mm in size, as is suitable for real CPU dies, whether they be IHS capped or not. If the data is an extrapolation from a 1" square die then that would explain the less than stellar performance.
|
hmmm... well that still doesn't explain me why the WW clones perform better on the same die and exact same test bed though (which also doesn't correspond to any other testing that's been ever done before) :shrug: