Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dacooltech
hmmm... well that still doesn't explain me why the WW clones perform better on the same die and exact same test bed though (which also doesn't correspond to any other testing that's been ever done before) :shrug:
|
I think you misunderstood what Etacovda was saying. He was postulating that JoeC, as of about 5 weeks ago when he stated that his old small-die testbed had broken, is now perhaps using his newer 1" square die and extrapolating results as per the content of this recent article by JoeC =>
http://www.overclockers.com/articles1259/
As in, is it possible that all blocks tested more than 5 weeks ago were all done in the original small die testbed, and all newer tests in the last 5 weeks (including the Storm) are now being done on the newer 1" sq. die and extrapolated?
That is what is being proposed. I truly don't know, but I do know that the WW would not fare too well on a 1" square solid heat die, but only because a 1" sq. die is not how CPU's distrubute heat, not even IHS capped CPU's.