View Single Post
Unread 09-19-2005, 07:02 AM   #44
Cathar
Thermophile
 
Cathar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 2,538
Default

Indeed Les, those figures were all derived with a 0.06 TIM C/W assumed. Had postulated much higher h(eff) figures in the past due to using a higher TIM resistance, but went back and recalculated against a 0.06 TIM C/W value.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Les
Difficult to comment further without access to this data
Yeah, I'm always going to be a little coy on divulging key specifics Les, for the usual reasons. Am pretty much convinced that the White Water and the Cascade both could've done with a thicker bp, especially so since I discovered that one of the thermal probes was faulty at about the same time as I released the Cascade. Oh well.

Without divulging exact details, the G7's bp thickness is far more in line with what works better both in theory and in practise.
Cathar is offline   Reply With Quote