Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Cathar
Indeed Les, those figures were all derived with a 0.06 TIM C/W assumed. Had postulated much higher h(eff) figures in the past due to using a higher TIM resistance, but went back and recalculated against a 0.06 TIM C/W value.
|
Yeah.
The importance of Incoherent's work in this area cannot be over estimated.(
link)