View Single Post
Unread 09-19-2005, 07:13 AM   #45
Les
Cooling Savant
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Wigan UK
Posts: 929
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cathar
Indeed Les, those figures were all derived with a 0.06 TIM C/W assumed. Had postulated much higher h(eff) figures in the past due to using a higher TIM resistance, but went back and recalculated against a 0.06 TIM C/W value.
Yeah.
The importance of Incoherent's work in this area cannot be over estimated.(link)
Les is offline   Reply With Quote