Well, Jaydee, I'm not sure what to make of it all, truthfully. I still don't think that Bill is a liar. I also don't think that Bruce's points are incorrect when they are quotes. Basically, Bill made some statements that could be construed as aspersions on another company's products without the data to back it up. But, I'm not believing that Bill wanted to be in the middle of PR activity. I think he was just stating some rather vague principles (e.g. single flow doesn't always help a lot). Then, Bruce basically states that "Bill is a competitor of those products, so take his statements with a grain of salt" and Bill gets upset.
Sounds like they just are communicating badly rather than either being the total villain.
But, I'm not a great judge of human motives, nor have I researched it as well as you have, Jaydee. Can't we all get along? Man, the 60's have been gone too long.
