Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lothar5150
I posted the scientific method because it is what Bill employs. What ever findings Bill sites can be independently verified. If you want to be critical of testing methods, as Cathar's statements where, that is fine in fact that is constructive to the process. However, attacking Bill's integrity is out of line.
As to his comment on the single pass radiator performance...As you may or may not know, Bill was working on a white paper on radiator performance for his previous employer. The white paper was completed but never published by the previous employer. Having personally surveyed every major radiator and radiator configuration available, Bill clearly has insight into radiator performance no one else has. Perhaps the reason Bill has not posted data is because those data belong to his previous employer.
Further, don't you think Bill would have looked at various configurations of radiators prior to producing the new Swiftech line of radiators? Certainly, there is no cost difference between in producing single vs. dual pass radiators. Why not separate yourself from the pack further? I can only surmise that there was no applicable performance difference found in testing.
|
I think it was Bill that also hammered Bruce for picking parts of other blocks and putting them together for his own block. I don't see that as any different than reverse engineering a rad and improving it for your own product..... Bruce did give credit were it was due aswell.