a man sees what he wants to see, . . . . .
my complaint was as described, and that is/was my interest
the subsequent fol de rol, and Bruce's bowel dumps, are not the issue - unless to you or others
maxracer joined the fray by saying that (some part of ?) Bruce's non-objectivity assertion he knew to be true,
and then deleted my post asking him to substantiate his statement
this deletion then "solved the problem" for MR he stated
- how to deal with troublesome test data ? hey, just pretend it does not exist
if this is how he solves problems, I have no interest in his work product (but I am really picky about some things)
if you want to analyze something jd, read Bruce's posts here and list each statement he has made, each single one eh ?
now for each ck probably true or false - and the facts necessary to know to validate each assertion
-> ?? does Bruce have that info/is it true ??
if not, if some of those claims are false . . . Bruce, your friend, has delivered himself into my hands
you want to give odds ?
to see the dots is not to understand their connection, I am hoping Bruce is wealthy
|