Pro/Forums - View Single Post

JPB · 10-20-2005, 07:01 AM

Well.. RAID5 built without problems (2+1+1 = 240 netto + spare), then updated to OS4. Did some stress testing since with Helios Lan Test (100 times reading/writing 300MB etc.) with no problems, write rate 4,5MB/s, read rate 7,8MB/s which is ok regarding the old hardware. But..

Before the machine went down I made a copy of all stuff (105GB) via AFP. Now, with the new OS4, I cannot save the files back - several errors complaining about folders not found, illegal filenames etc. etc. pp. No idea what they did to the AFPd, but it is complety shit now

, useless in an AFP-enviroment. Helios AFP test fails 50% of the newer AFP-features. If anyone plans to use these machines with AFP - forget it. Even a dumb Windows server is a better choice.

10-20-2005, 07:01 AM	#749
JPB Cooling Neophyte Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Earth Posts: 6	Well.. RAID5 built without problems (2+1+1 = 240 netto + spare), then updated to OS4. Did some stress testing since with Helios Lan Test (100 times reading/writing 300MB etc.) with no problems, write rate 4,5MB/s, read rate 7,8MB/s which is ok regarding the old hardware. But.. Before the machine went down I made a copy of all stuff (105GB) via AFP. Now, with the new OS4, I cannot save the files back - several errors complaining about folders not found, illegal filenames etc. etc. pp. No idea what they did to the AFPd, but it is complety shit now , useless in an AFP-enviroment. Helios AFP test fails 50% of the newer AFP-features. If anyone plans to use these machines with AFP - forget it. Even a dumb Windows server is a better choice.