only on procooling is a 'vendor' permitted to attack another
(as the R&D for an importer, am I a 'vendor' ? - others can address if desired)
that a major vendor of WCing components and systems would publish such in late 2005 reflects a total absence of intellectual honesty
the means of testing rad performance is well known
the required information to characterize rad performance is well known
the posting of incomplete data is how the ignorant are defrauded, why on earth would a major vendor do such ?
note that I do not accept that DD does not understand, they are perfectly competent
but someone (HW Labs ?) made them a push-up bra and they want to use it
how does the enthauast market progress with this crap ?
not with that vendor I would opine
|