Pro/Forums - View Single Post - can we agree on the basis of "C" in C/W ?

bobo5195 · 10-24-2005, 05:05 PM

i was about to say about small changes at low temps also the car water temp is exceptionally high so things are a bit iffy then.

I need to think about this correction for energy loss when water travels down a pipe. On one hand it makes alot of sense on the other the exteneed bernouli equation on which WC analysis is based is actually a load of bollocks. Either way W add in a block is small enough not to get me to worried saying that.

power = dP*Q

dP is proportional to mean velocity^2 which is roughly proportional to Q^2 (need to do maths to establish abit more)

Power = k * Q^3 so for high flow values i can see what your saying hmmm.

10-24-2005, 05:05 PM	#56
bobo5195 Cooling Savant Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: uk Posts: 400	i was about to say about small changes at low temps also the car water temp is exceptionally high so things are a bit iffy then. I need to think about this correction for energy loss when water travels down a pipe. On one hand it makes alot of sense on the other the exteneed bernouli equation on which WC analysis is based is actually a load of bollocks. Either way W add in a block is small enough not to get me to worried saying that. power = dPQ dP is proportional to mean velocity^2 which is roughly proportional to Q^2 (need to do maths to establish abit more) Power = k Q^3 so for high flow values i can see what your saying hmmm. Last edited by bobo5195; 10-24-2005 at 05:06 PM. Reason: spelling