Pro/Forums - View Single Post - can we agree on the basis of "C" in C/W ?

bobo5195 · 10-25-2005, 05:11 PM

The point of measuring both is not so much as a better measure. The second approach has oviously more potential for error but as a check for correct results. Given that all apart from airflow are already used i thought that it would be worth doing. And knowing the airflow is quite a useful factiod as well.

I should congratulate thermochill on a good rad i never realised the eff. was that good. I could easily see the reaching a performance level of 60%. One book i was reading read that rad eff over 60% are not speced because it costs to much although high spec power station ones are approaching 99% with super technology.

10-25-2005, 05:11 PM	#64
bobo5195 Cooling Savant Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: uk Posts: 400	The point of measuring both is not so much as a better measure. The second approach has oviously more potential for error but as a check for correct results. Given that all apart from airflow are already used i thought that it would be worth doing. And knowing the airflow is quite a useful factiod as well. I should congratulate thermochill on a good rad i never realised the eff. was that good. I could easily see the reaching a performance level of 60%. One book i was reading read that rad eff over 60% are not speced because it costs to much although high spec power station ones are approaching 99% with super technology.