Pro/Forums - View Single Post - can we agree on the basis of "C" in C/W ?

Les · 10-25-2005, 07:15 PM

Bobo
You are saying "the current approach does not work........( current approach - SD and effectiveness)"
You are suggesting that effectiveness is a check on "C/W(in)" and SD? Yet , to determine, it uses the same manipulation of the same data(+air-flow) .Doesn't make sense to me.
This means, to me, that you are concluding neither "C/W(in)" or SD can be used to characterize a radiator.
You have already expressed doubts over "C/W(out)" being independent of Q .
It does not leave much, if anything.
Yet , having dismissed all, your only suggestion is read a text on Heat Exchangers.
Surely this is a waste of time, in that it will surely confirm all measures "will not work".

10-25-2005, 07:15 PM	#65
Les Cooling Savant Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Wigan UK Posts: 929	Bobo You are saying "the current approach does not work........( current approach - SD and effectiveness)" You are suggesting that effectiveness is a check on "C/W(in)" and SD? Yet , to determine, it uses the same manipulation of the same data(+air-flow) .Doesn't make sense to me. This means, to me, that you are concluding neither "C/W(in)" or SD can be used to characterize a radiator. You have already expressed doubts over "C/W(out)" being independent of Q . It does not leave much, if anything. Yet , having dismissed all, your only suggestion is read a text on Heat Exchangers. Surely this is a waste of time, in that it will surely confirm all measures "will not work".