I used to have Keys and London, informative but a bit dated
I do understand what you are saying, but something which cannot be conveyed cannot be used - and we do like the useful here
I am an experimentalist (or so described) so fret little about theory -> untill its time to interpret the data at which point I'm right back in the soup
vacuum is (hopeful) Ben, I do insulation
Les
I had data sets showing 1% (and less) differences, but |absolute| accuracy at this level is questionable - though the results were repeatable
should we attempt to list 'effects' considered 'too small' to justify climbing through our ear backwards ?
|