Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Cathar
............
Please. I was thinking more along the lines of Incoherent's excellent work for much of the above.....
|
We(Incoherent and I) are exploring the possibility of obtaining numbers which may be closely related to TTV and Overall(die or IHS) "C/W" from Incoherent's method.(
link)
My current view is that Femlabs Centreline(FC) solution is closely related to TTV values
The Average(mean, median or whatever) is the Overall solution.
The problem is that I believe that FC solution requires modeling of the wb.
Hence my continual probing(
link) for Cathar's model for Cascade/Storm.
From RoboTech's work(
link) I infer a value for the Storm G4( @ 4.5w Hydraulic Power Loss(HPL))of h(eff)=170,000 if 0.1mm thick bp under a ~20x20mm cupped area, and a more likely h(eff)=240,000 if 1mm bp under a ~20x20mm cupped area. Inference based on my model(
link and
link) for the MP-05-SP where h=~215,000 ( 1.8gpm, 4.5w) over 14.4x14.4mm area.
This range(170,000-240,000) is incompatible with Cathars inferred value of < 77,000(Cathar infers 77,000 -83,000(
link) over unknown area @ 6w HPL)
With his access to unpublished data(eg
link) , it is difficult to not place some credence on his value.
This leaves me completely stalled in "Incoherent Data Analysis"(
link)
Maybe Incoherent has made some progress but........
Edit1: Corrected mis-quoted Cathar value for h(eff) and provided link
Edit2: Fixed non-working linkand spelling.