Pro/Forums - View Single Post

ricecrispi · 11-07-2005, 11:56 AM

This stuff should be unreactive to water. It seems to have simliar properties to graphite and might be brittle. I also read it had aromatic ring structure so chemically it should be very unreactive.

Easy way to solve this problem is email the expert and ask him instead of argue among ourselves when none of us are experts in the field.

Intersting reads
http://thermocomposite.com/Documents/10Wattchart.htm

http://students.chem.tue.nl/ifp03/synthesis.html

http://thermocomposite.com/Materials.htm
Says more heat conductive nano carbons can be produced $3 per pound and with cheap equipment. $200,000 is cheap? I guess when compared to several millions and still in the lab phase.

11-07-2005, 11:56 AM	#14
ricecrispi Cooling Savant Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: california Posts: 429	This stuff should be unreactive to water. It seems to have simliar properties to graphite and might be brittle. I also read it had aromatic ring structure so chemically it should be very unreactive. Easy way to solve this problem is email the expert and ask him instead of argue among ourselves when none of us are experts in the field. Intersting reads http://thermocomposite.com/Documents/10Wattchart.htm http://students.chem.tue.nl/ifp03/synthesis.html http://thermocomposite.com/Materials.htm Says more heat conductive nano carbons can be produced $3 per pound and with cheap equipment. $200,000 is cheap? I guess when compared to several millions and still in the lab phase.