[nikhsub1]

Originally Posted by unregistered

Scott
I accept that your questions are genuine; each model improves on that before
if the tool were so flawed, do you not think that a better one would be developed ?
you are assisting in the 'condemnation' of a test method about which you, and clearly Cathar, have no experience and little real info
I am unable to do other than share my experience in a general manner

it is rather strange that the only 'info' accepted w/o question is from Cathar, who has ok testing (we accept) but no hard data sets at all
yet those who do provide data are subjected to claims of bias, stupidity, incompetence, etc

No Bill, I do not claim stupidity or incompetence at all. All I am questioning is the TTV and its reported data, not the integrity of the people doing the testing with it, let's get that clear. I can appreciate those detailed things which you can not discuss. I am also very happy that this discussion has stayed somewhat civil, as I have said before there is no witch hunt here, we just want anwsers as does everyone else. Bill, if you can answer good, if not I understand; were any of the TTV's that were used socket 775 with the newish IHS as opposed to the old brick style IHS?