well,
Cathar said the results were due to a flawed test methodology
and I said the methodology was fine and the Swiftech results 'good' data (quite reproducible) but not (apparently ?) intelligible - missing a correlation permitting these numbers to be compared to others
the greater picture ?
if the Apogee cannot beat the Storm in CPU testing (as Swiftech's testing indicates), they have created for and by themselves a PR debacle
does Gabe have the balls to admit an error by him ?
and Cathar and I are quite in agreement as to the specific error
(I failed to think about what Roscal was saying, and why, else this would all have been more clearly defined from the onset)
|