View Single Post
Unread 12-11-2005, 03:37 PM   #30
Cathar
Thermophile
 
Cathar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 2,538
Default Re: Poll: Removed your IHS? What did it get you?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruiner
Possibly quibbling, but is it feasible that the IHS could serve as a 'heat spreader' when topped with a cheap aluminum retail heatsink? I'd guess the interface between the core and copper/nickel IHS is better than what you'd get from the core through a layer of wax to a grooved, non-flat slab of Al.
These are exactly the reasons and circumstances under which the use of IHS's were originally justified in technical white papers floating around 6-7 years ago.

Quote:
Once you're using either a high end flat-copper based HSF or a good WB, the IHS works as a 'cpu condom'....protects but limits sensitivity.
Yes, with the advent of better heatsinks, the original presumptions of shonky aluminium items is nowadays far less relevent. Protection is about the only reason left that is still valid.
Cathar is offline   Reply With Quote