Re: Scientific Integrity and Ethics
jd
I am not the arbiter of technical correctness,
just try to be realistic about the difference between engn and DIY (review stuff)
you seem to have forgotten the roles here,
did I not propose a CPU based DIY platform ? (shot down with bs scaremongering)
but no, simple is not sufficient and a die sim is required for procooling (though pH uses a CPU)
all test results are not bs to me, I can sort them if the details are known
3ed party . . . . . review bashing, I totally agree; but if the 3ed party testing is crap how is such info valuable is assessing the (naturally lying) mfgr's assertions ?
-> if a reviewer presumes to correct a mfgr's description then their own testing capability should at least have a similar capability to that of the mfgr being corrected
remember the thread topic: Scientific Integrity and Ethics
3ed party better ?
no, far worse if one gets into the freebie thing plus ignorance
|